Editorial and corrections policy

This policy explains how to interpret educational content and assessments, what should accompany an article or update, and how to request a correction.

Purpose and scope

Articles and resources cover AI readiness, skills, learning and organizational development. They support understanding and practical next steps without promising employment or financial outcomes. Interpret assessment results within the published methodology and the context in which the assessment was completed.

Sources and assumptions

Statistics and verifiable claims should identify their source, date and relevant context. Tool estimates depend on user inputs and model assumptions; they describe comparison scenarios rather than guaranteed results. Review the original source before relying on a figure for an important decision.

Attribution, review and AI assistance

Current articles are attributed to the Meqyas Team and link to its profile. This team attribution does not identify an individual writer or reviewer. Using AI tools to prepare a draft does not remove the responsibility to verify facts and sources, obtain human review and provide useful original context.

Dates and corrections

Articles display the publication and modification dates stored with the content. Reading an article does not update its modification date. To report an inaccurate statement, broken source or missing attribution, send the article URL, your concern and any supporting source through the contact page so the team can review it.

This policy sets an editorial standard; it does not claim that every older article has received an independent audit. For fast-changing topics such as tools, prices and the job market, check the source and its date when using the information.